|
|
|
President
or Preacher? On Tuesday, February 11, the Religion & Culture communications initiative hosted an audio news conference entitled President or Preacher?: George W. Bush's Irresponsible Use of Religious Language. Religion & Culture grantees Dr. Elaine Pagels of Princeton University and Rev. C. Welton Gaddy of the Interfaith Alliance criticized President George W. Bush's consistent and reckless use of religious language, saying that such language is divisive and destructive to the healthy debate essential to the democratic process. Both theologians detailed how the President has used religious language to stifle political debate on key domestic and foreign policy issues, damage the separation between religion and government and undermine religious pluralism in the United States. Douglas Gould & Co. was very successful in obtaining extensive coverage on the topic, including increased exposure for both grantees. From the initial print placement in the New York Times Week in Review section, culminating in the cover of Newsweek that includes the words: "Bush & God: Why His 'God Talk' Worries Friends & Foes," we can sincerely report that we believe the audio news conference sparked a critical examination of the President's theological beliefs and political motivations. Indeed, moments after our audio news conference closed, Ari Fleischer was asked about the President's religious language at a White House press briefing. And note that the U.S. News & World Report Table of Contents summarizes their cover story as "George Bush's push for war. Building on his instinct for action and using the language of evangelical Christianity, the president believes he is on a sacred mission to remove the Iraqi despot." Certainly we succeeded in challenging editors and journalists throughout the nation to a more critical examination of the intersection of religion, politics, and culture. The following articlessome of which quote Dr. Pagels and Dr. Rev. Gaddy directly appeared in major news outlets between February 7, 2003 and March 30, 2003. Articles for the month of March can be found here Articles for the month of April can be found here Articles for the month of May can be found here
Articles for the month of April can be found here Articles for the month of May can be found here |
|
FEBRUARY 7 Religion and Ethics Newsweekly This Feb. 7 transcript from the PBS television program Religion and Ethics Newsweekly details the debate over whether President Bush's use of religious language unites or divides the country. Dr. Pagels is quoted repeatedly in the piece. FEBRUARY 9 The New York Times In this Feb. 9 piece in the New York Times, Laurie Goodstein explores how President Bush has turned increasingly to religious language in the past several weeks to describe domestic and foreign policy goals. Goodstein quotes Dr. Pagels as saying that such language, while it can be unifying, could also be divisive and dangerous. FEBRUARY 10 The Baltimore Sun Article also appeared on the Common Dreams website. In this Feb. 10 article, David Greene of the Baltimore Sun explores the implications of - and the risks behind - President Bush's use of religious language in relation to U.S. foreign and domestic policy. FEBRUARY 11 Religion News Service Article also ran on the Beliefnet, Baptist Standard and Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life website. This article, one of two on the topic released by Religion News Service on February 11, focuses on a perceived shift in President Bush's theology and theological rhetoric -- from one of personal transformation to describing a Calvinist "divine plan" laid out by God. The reporter, Deborah Caldwell, quotes Rev. Gaddy in the piece. Religion News Service HEADLINE: Bush's God-Talk Puts Off Some in Religious Community BYLINE: Barbara C. Neff Article also ran in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and was excerpted in Hotline, a Capitol Hill newsletter. This Religion News Service article, released on Feb. 11, details the content of the President or Preacher audio news conference, and quotes both Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels extensively. Philadelphia Inquirer HEADLINE: President Bush's religious language may be heartfelt - but what if it's also exclusionary? BYLINE: Jane Eisner Article also ran in the Tallahassee Democrat. In this Feb. 11 opinion piece, Jane Eisner of the Philadelphia Inquirer writes that President Bush has forgotten that he's talking to mixed company when incorporating religious terminology into his public remarks. Eisner goes on to write that Bush seems to have decided that all people of faith believe in the "same kind of God, the same definition of history, and the same trust in grace and Providence." She urges the President to find a language that includes, not excludes, people. FEBRUARY 12 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Article also ran in syndication in: This article, which covered the audio news conference in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, focuses on the concerns of religious leaders that President Bush is usurping the role of preacher or even inciting Islamic fundamentalists with his use of religious "good versus evil" references. The Commercial Appeal HEADLINE: All exalt, exhort; what does He hear? BYLINE: David Waters In this Feb. 12 opinion piece, "Faith Matters" columnist David Waters of the Commercial Appeal in Memphis writes that judging by the amount of religious rhetoric, one would think we were heading into a holy war. Waters quotes Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels several times. Although he also writes that every President has used religious language, he cites Rev. Gaddy's contention that Bush's use is "too political and too particular" for someone who is a leader of all Americans. The Star Tribune In this Feb. 12 article from the Star Tribune in Minneapolis, Martha Sawyer Allen focuses on how Dr. Pagels and Rev. Gaddy said during the news conference that President Bush has polarized the nation and prevented any serious debate about a war with Iraq. The article also quotes Richard Land, a Southern Baptist leader with close ties to the White House, as saying that the President's "sense of divine oversight is part of why he has become such a good wartime leader." FEBRUARY 13 The Charlotte Observer The Nando Times In this Feb. 13 opinion piece which appeared in the on-line Nando Times and in the Sacramento Bee, retired English professor Gary Sloan writes that President Bush revealed his insensitivity to the 30 or 40 million Americans who don't believe in God during a recent speech at the 51st Annual National Prayer Breakfast. Sloan contends that only 54 percent of Americans said they belonged to a church -- including non-Christian congregations -- in a recent poll. He concludes that Bush is certainly free to express his beliefs, but should not try to foist his religious faith on anyone. FEBRUARY 14 Washington Post In this Feb. 13 column from the Washington Post, E.J. Dionne writes that President Bush's use of religious rhetoric in speeches does not necessarily mean that he is a religious fanatic. He notes that Bush should be more careful, given the potential conflict with Iraq, than his predecessors in invoking the Almighty, but concludes that his penchant for mentioning God in speeches is not a troublesome quality. FEBRUARY 15 The Deseret News Carrie Moore contrasts the assertions made by Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels during the news conference and the analysis offered by two local political scientists in this Feb. 15 piece from Salt Lake City's Deseret News. Valerie Hudson, a political science professor at Brigham Young University, is quoted as saying she never heard or read of Bush holding himself up as a religious leader with the right to impose his moral view on the nation. Ted Wilson, director of the Hinkley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah, notes in the article that President Bush is facing challenges no previous administration has had to face, and that even if Bush said "something a little weird," he deserves a break from criticism -- at least right now. The Ledger Article also appeared in syndication in these outlets: In this opinion piece, which appeared in the Ledger (Lakeland, Florida) on Feb. 15, Cary McMullen characterizes the criticism of Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels as "a little over the top." McMullen asserts that while President Bush is a conservative Christian, he is not a fundamentalist, and that his unabashed use of religious language is typical of evangelical Christians. He repeats a question that he posed to Rev. Gaddy during the news conference regarding Abraham Lincoln's use of religious terminology in his inaugural address, and concludes his piece by writing that no-one should have to relegate his faith "to an unused back room." The Times-Picayune Article also appeared in syndication in these outlets: In this Feb. 15 feature article from the Times-Picayune in New Orleans, Bruce Nolan examines President Bush's use of religious allusions from several different viewpoints. In addition to Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels, he quotes Rev. Richard Cizik, vice president of the National Association of Evangelicals, who believes that the American people expect and respect the use of such language. Richard Land, the head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Liberty Commission and a personal friend of President Bush, is quoted as saying Bush believes that "there is a divine providence at work in the history and purpose of the United States." The Rev. Gabriel Fackre of the Andover Newton Theological School and Stephen Chapman of Duke Divinity School express similar concerns to that of Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels in the article. Rocky Mountain News HEADLINE: Is Bush too prone to moralizing speech? BYLINE: Vincent Carroll In this Feb. 15 opinion piece from Denver's Rocky Mountain News, Vincent Carroll opens his article by detailing the concerns of Dr. Pagels and Rev. Gaddy. He goes on to write that even "progressive" presidents such as Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson and John Kennedy "deployed the language of moral evangelism" when the nation was confronting issues of war and peace. He concludes that those bothered by such references to religious faith are justified in voting against a candidate that employs such language, but that they will never find a candidate who avoids morally charged phrases, especially during a time of war. FEBRUARY 16 The Boston Globe Boston Globe reporter John Donnelly explored Bush's use of religious rhetoric in this Feb. 16 piece, which quotes Rev. Gaddy on the subject. Donnelly also quotes Melissa Rogers, the executive director of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, and National Association of Evangelicals president Richard Cizik in the piece. Several theology professors are also quoted, and Donnelly provides detailed examples of how President Bush has used religious terminology in his public speeches and remarks. Newsday HEADLINE: The Gospel According To Bush BYLINE: Paul Vitello This Feb. 16 column by Paul Vitello in New York's Newsday
criticizes Bush's use of religious language in speeches because such
terminology causes him - whether intentionally or not - "to chip
away at the secular underpinning of our uniquely democratic country."
Vitello goes on to quote Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels, citing her statement
that framing events as "God's people versus Satan's people"
can only end in one side annihilating the other. San Antonio Express-News This Feb. 16 column in the San Antonio Express-News focuses on President Bush's use of religious language. Dr. Pagels is quoted as saying that his particular use of the terminology is destructive, as it "bypasses the brain and goes straight to the gut." St. Louis Post-Dispatch HEADLINE: Faith and politics: President and preacher This Feb. 16 editorial in the St. Louis Post Dispatch details how President Bush has portrayed the war on terrorism in religious terms. The editorial writer notes that "on questions of war, religious rhetoric is a tradition as ancient as it is dangerous," and that while President Bush's rhetoric may be a comfort to conservative Christians, many other Americans feel excluded by his words and deeds. FEBRUARY 18 The Associated Press Article also ran on the CNN website, the Yahoo! News website, the New York Times website, the San Francisco Chronicle website, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life website, the Canadian Press/Canada.com website, and the website of WTEV-TV -- a CBS affiliate in Jacksonville, Florida. This Feb 18 piece from the Associated Press details numerous examples of President Bush's use of religious allusions in his public remarks, and quotes Rev. Gaddy as saying that the President is coming out of a very particular religious tradition -- evangelical Christianity. As such, Bush's rhetoric "implies a lack of appreciation for the vast pluralism of religion" in America, according to Gaddy. FEBRUARY 19 The Indianapolis Star In this Feb. 19 opinion piece, Andrea Neal of the Indianapolis Star criticizes the remarks of Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels, saying that anyone offended by President Bush's religious rhetoric might take offense at the motto on the US penny. Neal writes that Bush's use of religious language is "typical for an American president, from George Washington's time on." The Shelbyville News FEBRUARY 21 Chicago Tribune Julia Lieblich details how President Bush's use of religious language is alienating to Americans and others who don't share his evangelical views in this Feb. 21 piece from the Chicago Tribune. Lieblich approaches the issue from a variety of religious perspectives. In addition to quoting Rev. Gaddy and Dr. Pagels, she offers thoughts on the subject from a Southern Baptist leader, a religious scholar from the Barre Center for Buddhist Studies, the president of the Islamic Society of North America and the president of the Anti-Defamation League. ABC News.com HEADLINE: God and Presidents Bush Invokes Religion, but Past Presidents' Beliefs Also Controversial BYLINE: Gregg Easterbrook This Feb 17 piece from Beliefnet ran on the ABC News website on Feb. 21. In the piece, Gregg Easterbrook argues that while many are pleased or upset that President Bush continues to use religious language in speaking about the war on terrorism and other matters, his beliefs would seem quite conventional compared to those of past presidents such as Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln. The Northern Star HEADLINE: Bush, religion mix risky, but tolerable This Feb 21 editorial from the Northern Star, the student newspaper at Northern Illinois University, points out how President Bush has used his religious background to "soothe America's grief." The editorial writers note that while Bush's use of religious language should not shock anyone, he should remember that there is a portion of the American population that won't be able to follow him. FEBRUARY 22 Austin American Statesman This Feb 18 piece from the Associated Press was in the last Religion in the Media summary, but was reprinted in the Austin American Statesman and Tallahassee Democrat on Feb. 22. Loven's piece was also excerpted on the Mother Jones website this past week. The article also ran on the CNN website, the Yahoo! News website, the New York Times website, the San Francisco Chronicle website, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life website, the Canadian Press/Canada.com website, and the website of WTEV-TVa CBS affiliate in Jacksonville, Florida. Article also ran in syndication in these outlets:
The Charlotte Observer HEADLINE: President Bush's religious language may be heartfeltbut what if it's also exclusionary? BYLINE: Jane Eisner This Feb. 11 opinion piece by Jane Eisner of the Philadelphia Inquirer was in the last Religion in the Media summary and also appeared in the Tallahassee Democrat during that week. It ran again in the Charlotte Observer on Feb. 22. The Charlotte Observer HEADLINE: When Presidents Talk of God BYLINE: E. J. Dionne Jr. This Feb. 13 column from the Washington Post appeared in the last Religion in the Media summary, but ran again in the Charlotte Observer on Feb. 22. FEBRUARY 24 Time Magazine In this piece from the Feb. 24 edition of Time, Joe Klein writes that President Bush's public piety is not unique or extreme among Presidents, and that there is little evidence that he is "either messianic or a hard-edged religious determinist." What is disturbing about his use of such language, writes Klein, is the fact that Bush's faith does not impel him to have second thoughts or question the possible consequences of his actions. The Indianapolis Star HEADLINE: The role of religion in political discussion BYLINE: Rev. Rachel Frey The Rev. Rachel Frey wrote this letter to the editor of the Indianapolis Star, defending Dr. Pagels and Rev. Gaddy in response to a Feb. 19 column by Andrea Neal, who criticized the two theologians. Frey, a preacher in Avon, Indiana, writes that she is "deeply suspicious when the language of faith... is used to promote an extreme political agenda." USA Today HEADLINE: Iraq will test Bush's spiritual bond with Americans BYLINE: David Frum In this Feb. 24 opinion piece from USA Today, former Bush speech writer David Frum defends the President's use of religious language, saying critics' fears about such use are misplaced since "if anything, Bush's religion biases him toward caution and restraint." Frum argues that Bush's new kind of leadership - which he deems a "spiritual leadership" - will be put to the test during a forthcoming war on Iraq. The Washington Times HEADLINE: A president's call to prayer; Bush's faith makes dogmatic secularists squirm BYLINE: Suzanne Fields This opinion piece in the Feb. 24 edition of the Washington Times quotes Rev. Gaddy, but defends President Bush's use of religious language. Suzanne Fields writes that "most Americans appear to appreciate the president's comforting words, drawn easily from his faith." The Goshen News HEADLINE: Bush doesn't deserve criticism about faith This editorial from the Goshen News in Goshen, Indiana defends President Bush's use of religious language. The writers contend that in troubling times, "there's something comforting about a leader who implies that maybe he alone doesn't have all the answers." The piece concludes that in such a challenging era as the one in which we live, he can be forgiven for looking for supernatural help. Religion & Culture: Meeting the Challenge of Pluralism focuses on the role of religion in shaping our lives and cultural values, and serving as a resource for positive social change. © 2002–2005 Douglas Gould & Co., Inc. |